![]() The report’s most important accusation remains unproven election, and discrediting it does not undermine the evidence that the Kremlin helped Trump win the election with his campaign’s eager encouragement and cooperation.” - Max Boot, Washington Post But the Steele dossier did not launch the FBI investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. Like many raw intelligence reports, it was full of uncorroborated information - a lot of which doesn’t check out. The dossier was a distraction from the real scandal But it would mean coming to terms with our conduct and whatever collateral damage these errors have caused to our reputation.” - Bill Grueskin, New York Times “Addressing the shortcomings over the dossier doesn’t mean ignoring the corruption and democracy-shattering conduct that the Trump administration pushed for four years. The media has a duty to acknowledge its failures in covering the dossier At best, the FBI allowed itself to get duped into playing along with a political hit against, first, a presidential candidate and, then, the duly elected president of the United States.” - Editorial, National Review “Too good to check is an impulse that never serves journalists well, and it’s even worse when it is the policy of a law-enforcement agency wielding awesome powers. ![]() The real issue is how the intelligence community treated the dossier’s allegations Nor would it change the fact that the Trump family welcomed this intervention.” - Anne Applebaum, The Atlantic election using hacked material and a disinformation campaign. ![]() “Even if every single word in the Steele dossier was wrong, that would not change the fact that the Russians sought to manipulate the U.S. The Steele dossier is largely irrelevant to the question of Trump’s Russia ties Clinton lost the election, but the Russia tale sabotaged an incoming President with relentless media assaults and a special counsel investigation.” - Editorial, Wall Street Journal “The purpose was to present the FBI with oppo-research that masqueraded as ‘intelligence,’ and it worked. Steele accomplished his goal of undermining Trump from the start of his presidency What’s nextĭurham’s inquiry into the Russia investigation is ongoing and it’s unclear whether it might produce more indictments or new information about the Steele dossier’s origins in the future. Those inquiries, like the Mueller report and the bipartisan report by the Senate Intelligence Committee, have found substantial evidence of impropriety that have nothing to do with Steele’s report. While few will defend the substance of the dossier at this point, mainstream and left-leaning commentators have accused Trump’s defenders of trying to use its shortcomings to discredit all investigations into the former president’s behavior. There have also been calls for a deeper examination into how much the intelligence community relied on the dossier in its broader investigations into the Trump campaign’s relationship with Russia. Many conservatives have argued this is merely an effort to save face from organizations that spent years promoting the report’s dodgy claims as a way to build suspicion against Trump. ![]() The indictment has launched a new round of debate about the response to the dossier’s release and the continuing impact of its many shaky claims.Ī number of prominent media outlets - including the New York Times, CNN and the Washington Post - have published lengthy reevaluations of their own coverage of the dossier in the past few weeks. That indictment came from special counsel John Durham, who was appointed by former Attorney General William Barr to determine whether the intelligence community broke any laws while investigating Trump-Russia connections. Over that same period, however, multiple substantive investigations have presented solid evidence to back up one of the dossier’s central claims - that the Russian government engaged in an aggressive effort to influence the election, and that the Trump campaign welcomed the assistance.Įarlier this month, however, a Russia analyst who was a primary source for the dossier was charged with five counts of lying to the FBI about where he got the information he passed on to Steele. In the nearly five years since its release, many of the most explosive accusations compiled by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele - including the alleged existence of a so-called pee tape - remained unverified or have been fully disproven. The Steele dossier, a collection of unverified intelligence that alleged deep levels of cooperation between the Trump campaign and Russian government during the 2016 presidential campaign, has been the source of intense debate from the moment it was published in January 2017.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |